Insights by feedback source

Feedback source	Key insights
Traces	The agent generally follows the artifact-generation workflow and validation loop, but execution is generic and sometimes monolithic. Some repairs happen after validators pass, showing validation is not strict enough. Parent concentration trace demonstrated a good deterministic-calculation pattern worth generalizing.
Human feedback	Human feedback is the strongest evidence for domain gaps: runway must be 11 months with financing pressure; ARR must use finance-controlled source of truth; concentration must roll up to parent accounts; SOC 2 Type I and Type II must not be conflated; official NRR and CAC payback must be refused when unsupported.
LLM feedback	LLM insights reinforce the human themes: ARR headline numbers need caveats, unsupported metrics should not be promoted, retention and pipeline claims require source caveats, and SOC 2 Type II completion must not be overstated.
Generated evals	Five targeted evals were generated from the feedback themes: runway/burn, ARR source of truth, customer concentration parent rollup, SOC 2 precision, and unsupported metrics refusal. These encode the right regression surface and should be checked in.
Eval-gate results	The current eval gate passed: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed. This indicates the latest generated eval suite is satisfied, but the suite should be persisted and expanded to cover validators, artifact parsing, and calculation correctness.
Harness config	The harness already has strong generic evidence, citation, artifact, and validation requirements. Its main weakness is that it lacks explicit financial-diligence invariants and deterministic runtime checks for the exact mistakes surfaced by feedback.