Agent Note: Composer e2e gestures gate on the contenteditable attribute
Status: implemented Archived: 2026-09-04
English | 中文
Problem
Two Playwright gesture semantics silently changed when the composer became a Lexical contenteditable , and both bit only under CI load. While the input machine is adjudicating or submitting a send — and in every locked state — the composer renders read-only by flipping `contenteditable` to `"false"` on the same element. On that element `fill()` throws immediately (`Element is not an <input>, <textarea> or [contenteditable] element`) instead of waiting through actionability, and `expect.poll(() => input.isEnabled())` is a no-op guard: Playwright's enablement check ignores both `aria-disabled` and `contenteditable` on a , so it reports true throughout the read-only window. The exposed race is only a few frames wide — the permission-policy scenario stayed green for weeks until a Remote-routed subagent refactor stretched submit settling enough for CI to land inside it.
Decision
Composer e2e gestures go through writeComposerDraft in apps/web/tests/support.ts, which waits for the editable attribute on the gesture's own target (input.and(page.locator('[contenteditable="true"]'))) before acting and replaces the draft with per-key strokes. Scenario code that must wait for the composer to reopen after a submit gates on the contenteditable attribute, never on isEnabled().
Alternatives considered
- Waiting inside each scenario instead of inside the helper: rejected — every new scenario re-discovers the trap the hard way, and the fix that motivated this note was already the second such site.
- Keeping
fill()and pollingaria-disabledbefore each call: rejected — it leaves the dropped-edit racefill()has directly after trigger-menu and chip interactions (Lexical's internal selection lags the DOM selection inside one task), which the per-key helper also covers. - Making the product surface tolerate
fill()(accepting synthetic edits while read-only): rejected — the read-only window is deliberate UI truth during submit adjudication; loosening it for tests would change user-visible behavior.
Consequences
- A bare
input.fill(...)against[data-composer-input]is a latent CI race even when it passes locally; the helper is the supported gesture. isEnabled()on the composer asserts nothing. Existing polls of it guard nothing and read as coverage they do not provide.- A running turn by itself keeps the composer editable — that is what queueing types into — so the gate waits only through submit adjudication and locked states, not for turn completion.