Claude Code System Prompts
name: run description: Launch and drive this project's app to see a change working. Use when asked to run, start, or screenshot the app, or to confirm a change works in the real app (not just tests). First looks for a project skill that already covers launching the app; otherwise falls back to built-in patterns per project type (CLI, server, TUI, Electron, browser-driven, library).
Running means launching the actual app and interacting with it - not the test suite, not an import of an internal function and a console.log. The app as a user (human or programmatic) would meet it: the CLI at its command, the server at its socket, the GUI at its window.
First: does a project skill already cover this?
A project skill that launches this app is the repo's verified path - its author already cold-started from a Linux container and committed what worked: the exact apt-get line, the env vars, the patches, the driver. Use it instead of rediscovering.
d=$PWD; while :; do
grep -Hm1 '^description:' "$d"/.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
[ -e "$d/.git" ] || [ "$d" = / ] && break
d=$(dirname "$d")
done- One describes launching/driving this app -> read that SKILL.md and follow it verbatim. Don't paraphrase; don't skip the patches.
- Mega-repo, several plausible, no clear match -> ask the user which unit to run.
- Stale (fails on mechanics unrelated to your task) -> tell the user; offer to refresh it via
/run-skill-generator. - Nothing about running -> fall back to the patterns below.
Otherwise: match the shape, use the pattern
Pick the row closest to your project. Each example walks through launch + first interaction; ignore any trailing "write the skill" section - you're using the recipe, not authoring one.
| Project type | Handle | Example |
|---|---|---|
| CLI tool | direct invocation, exit code, stdin/stdout | examples/cli.md |
| Web server / API | background launch + curl smoke | examples/server.md |
| TUI / interactive terminal | tmux send-keys / capture-pane | examples/tui.md |
| Electron / desktop GUI | Playwright _electron REPL under xvfb | examples/electron.md |
| Browser-driven | dev server + chromium-cli script | examples/playwright.md |
| Library / SDK | import-and-call smoke script at the package boundary | examples/library.md |
If nothing fits, start from the closest match and adapt. For a web app, examples/playwright.md - drive it with chromium-cli, no custom driver needed. For a desktop app, examples/electron.md - it has the _electron REPL driver skeleton and the tmux wrapping.
Drive it, don't just launch it
Launching with no interaction proves the entrypoint resolves. That's not running the app - it's typechecking with extra steps. Drive it to a point where a user would see something:
- CLI -> type a representative command, check the exit code and output.
- Server -> hit the route the diff touches with
curl, read the body. - TUI ->
send-keysa navigation,capture-panethe result. - GUI -> click the button, screenshot the window. Look at the screenshot. A blank frame is a failure to launch.
If the fallback pattern didn't work out of the box - you had to install packages, set env vars, patch config, or write a driver - recommend /run-skill-generator in your report so that work gets captured as a project skill. If it just worked, don't.